Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 472

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 487

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 494

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 530

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/swvanews/public_html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 623
Southwest Virginia Blogs » 2006 » January

Archive for January, 2006

State of the Union

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Well, it has been infinitely long since I made a post here one Virginia Left Wing, mainly because of the ever-pressing government homework that arises every day(Neal, don't say a word). But anyway, you asked for it. Here's a new post... finally.



President Bush delivered his annual State of the Union address tonight as the country contemplates its actual place in the world, seeing as how our economy isn't where it should be, more than half of the country thinks Bush is failing, and we are hated by more and more countries every day.



He outlined points on terrorism and stem-cell research, among points on the war.



I think one of the things that I found funny was how the Repubs. would stand up at almost everything, and the Dems stood up, like, once. I found that to be quite funny.



And the point made about human-animal hybrids? What an idiot! That is NOT stem-cell research! That is some made-up stuff that does not even relate to the science.



I myself believe in stem cell research, believing it will find possibly find a cure for cancer, AIDS, and everything else we need to combat when it comes to diseases.

A Better Way?

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006

I found Tim Kaine’s speech sort of hilarious after seeing what he said during the campaign. I guess he hopes people from the other 49 states won’t know that. The “eyebrow” made an appearance the whole time throughout the speech. At one point, I think both of them went up.

The “A Better Way” theme I think has several meanings. It probably means large tax increases like the ones he proposed here in Virginia a week ago. It may also refer to Mark Warner as being the “better way” in 2008. I was surprised that he never mentioned Mark Warner by name dozens of times as I thought he most certainly would.

Tim Kaine’s speech is keeping with the Democrats “we have a plan” but not providing the plan. It is like they are providing a box (their plan), but not filling (the details) the box with anything.

In short, I predict Tim Kaine’s speech will not be remembered by most.

On the State of the Union

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006

I think President Bush did a great job on the State of the Union Address tonight. I would have maybe liked to see him further elaborate on certain issues. I think he explained several key things well like the “spying program” and backed it up with an example of Al Qaeda operating in that manner prior to 9/11.

One thing I always find interesting is watching the demeanor of both political sides and the supposedly “non-partisan” officials present like the Supreme Court members, Joint Chiefs, and staff. The Democrats weren’t as a whole too pleased with Bush’s points on several issues. I also found it funny that the Supreme Court Justices and Joint Chiefs had to sometimes think twice about whether they should applaud of stand for certain key points of the President’s speech.

All in all it was a good speech.

The power of compromise

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Things looked a little different this morning as the Valley awoke to a gray morning. We must have gotten a shower during the night because the deck was damp. The wind was also blowing this morning. I didn't get very...

Opposed To Global Warming

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
A recent post by Ms. Elenaeous seemed to embrace global warming. If fact she wanted to "take out those aerosol hairspray and deodorant cans and let's all spray away!"



Consider this. Most times the MSM will say something like the vast majority of scientist believe that global warming is real. However, no one ever mentions The Petition Project. This is where more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with advanced degrees, have signed a petition stating



There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.


These are not just some crackpots, instead ther are 2,660 physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and environmental scientists. This is a real brain trust. So do not believe that only whackos still do not believe. A bunch of smart people still are not convinced.



Besides, what if global warming is real? There could be some benefits, such as:



1. Make land in the US and Canadian plains suitable for farming

2. Melting glaciers could increase the availability of fresh water and improve the water table

3. Longer growing seasons

4. More land availble for development.



Lastly, projections are that the average earth temperture will rise a few degree F. Therefore, how will it make such a drastic change if Antartica (store place for 90% of the world's ice) goes from an average temperature of -60 F to -58 F?



Alarmist should think things through and not be satisfied with the easy, and often incorrect, explanation.

Not EXACTLY Tagged

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006

Ok, so Kim didn’t really tag ANYONE, but since I read it, I thought I would join in all the fun like she asked.
Four jobs I’ve had in my life

1. Dog Washer/Groomer
2. Retail sales Clerk
3. Waitress/Bartender
4. Attorney

Four movies I can watch over and over

1. Sweet Home Alabama
2. How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days
3. A Time to Kill
4. The Land Before Time

Four places I have lived

1. Virginia
2. South Carolina
3. Indiana
4. ____________

**I’m just putting states…the individual places weren’t so exciting…and apparently I’ve only lived in 3 states….

Four TV shows I love to watch

1. Gilmore Girls
2. Without A Trace
3. 7th Heaven (it makes me so mad when I watch it, but I can’t help it)
4. Related

Four places I have been on vacation

1. Cozumel, Mexico
2. Anchorage, Alaska
3. Everywhere in Florida
4. The Bahamas

Four of my favorite dishes

1. Grilled Chicken
2. Hash brown caserole
3. Corn Pudding
4. Anything with squash

**Do you people think I actually cook??

Four websites I visit daily

1. Cnn.com
2. foxnews.com
3. hokiesports.com
4. espn.com

Four places I would rather be right now

1-4. Anchorage Alaska….you all know why.

Four bloggers I am tagging…Since Kim was nice and didn’t tag anyone, I’m not tagging anyone either…but if you read mine, I think you should do it..

Tomorrow I’ll write part three of Know Thy Enemies…this is going to be a long series.

Elmo Lives At My House

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Anyone with little people in their house will recognize Elmo from Sesame Street. We have a plethera (I never thought I would get to use that word) of Elmos at my house. I believe he is like those worms that are able to reproduce by themselves. Elmo is getting out of control. Be prepared to contact Tom Cruise for a Sci Fi remake using Elmo as the Blob.



An Elmo video was playing the other day. I was not watching, instead, I was doing something constuctive - I was trying to take a nap. After listening a few minutes, I began to pay attention to this little red menance called Elmo. I have since determined that Elmo may be evil, and he definitely has some strange friends. Here are my reasons:



1. There is a recurring character called "Mr. Noodle"

2. Mr. Noodle is always hanging around outside of Elmo's window

3. The window shade is possessed! It obeys Elmo's commands of "Up shade" and "Down shade"

4. There is also a possessed computer that runs around Elmo's room saying "You've got mail, Elmo has mail"

5. Elmo loves his goldfish and his crayon (one crayon)

6. Elmo is a goldfish whisperer - he knows what that fish is thinking

7. In one video, Elmo has a blanket that seems to be alive, or possessed



I more I pay attention to Elmo, the more convinced I am that Elmo and his friends are from "the dark side". Sesame Street - good wholesome entertainment - HA.



Wait, I think I can see the black helicopters coming over the ridge.

Samuel Alito Confirmed

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006

Earlier today, after a 58-42 Senate vote, Samuel Alito was confirmed and sworn in as the newest Supreme Court Justice.

I think its safe to say life as we know it is no longer - regardless if that is a good or bad thing for you personally.

State of the Union

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006

I just got home from the Dickenson County Board of Supervisors’ meeting and am getting settled in to watch Pres. Bush’s State of the Union speech and more importantly Governor Tim Kaine’s response.

But the big news MSNBC is reporting is that antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan — who was invited to attend President Bush’s State of the Union speech — has been arrested by Capitol police. Why am I not suprised?

Ms. Sheehan received her invite from Congresswoman Lynn Woosley.

Update:

It is over and Bush gave us his usual spill with a dose of “Watch out Iran” tossed in for good measure.

Governor Kaine did a great job with the response. That is one of those jobs everyone wants and hates at the same time.

A lot of people were afraid national Democrats were taking advantage of Kaine by putting him out there like that. To the contrary, after watching the speech, I think it was the other way around.

What Hath Ol’ Russ Wrought?

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
From the Washington Times: Liberal activists promote a ruckus to silence Bush "Make noise, not war. Liberal activists -- among them graying leftovers from the Vietnam-era antiwar movement -- plan to gather near the Capitol tonight, banging pots and pans to drown out President Bush's State of the Union address. "

Consumer Confidence

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Roanoke Times: strange – didn’t see this in the paper – wonder why?

-

The Conference Board (1/31/06) said its index of consumer sentiment rose to 106.3 to a 3-year high!

-

"Consumers grew more optimistic about the jobs market at year-end, according to the Conference Board."

-

"Consumers saying that jobs were "plentiful" rose to 26.9 percent in January from 23.3 percent in December while those who claimed that jobs were "hard to get" fell to 20.3 percent in January from 22.5 percent in December."

-

Perhaps this didn’t fit well into The Editors view of how he could assist his party’s mid-term election propaganda machine.

-

Prior items:

http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2006/01/economy-headlines.html

-

Bush Lame-Duck?

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Roanoke Times, 1/29/06, Pg A3: Analysis: Bush finds it harder to win GOP support for his big initiatives.

-

Children let’s reflect on the past several months together:

-

Can you say: 72 to 25: Kill the anti-Alito filibuster

-

Can you say: 58 to 42: Confirm Judge Alito

-

Can you say: 78 to 22: Confirm Chief Judge Roberts

-

It appears this lame-duck can still kick some mean butt!

-

Prior lame-duck items:

http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2005/08/lame-duck.html

-

Trifecta from Hell

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Roanoke Times: Didn’t see this covered: Even The Editor must be embarrassed by the spectacle of this vile and vicious Trifecta from Hell

-

USA Today, 1/30/06, Pg 6A: Cindy Sheehan meets with Chavez

-

Major TV coverage of Harry Belefonte ranting and raving incoherently about the big and bad Pres. Bush

-

What a team! Cindy, Hugo and Harry!

Talk about coming out of the closet! These folks out-nasty Howard Dean!

-

-

Washington Post coverage of Sheehan-Chavez love-in:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/29/AR2006012900620.html

-

Prior items:

http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2005/09/sheehan-protest.html

-

I hate it when that happens

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
I hate it when I forget that my #17-ranked Georgetown Hoyas are playing until after the game has ended. I love it when they beat DePaul for their fifth-straight win, and the 14th in the last 16 games. The Hoyas are now 15-4 (6-2), and playing as well as anyone in the country.

Like HELL It’s A Western

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006


I started to post this at film geeks... but it's more of a political thing; one of my outbursts. So I posted it here, instead.

I read this in the paper the other day and just about launched out of my chair:

Western fans can rejoice once more. A tale of cowboys on the range is back in the saddle as lead contender for Academy Awards nominations...

Of course, Brokeback Mountain is not your father's Western, not John Wayne riding through all those John Ford epics, not even Clint Eastwood striding with anti-hero bloodlust in Unforgiven.

Set in more contemporary times, Brokeback Mountain is the story of two men who have a romantic fling as young sheepherders, then find their summer of love blossoming into a lifelong passion they conceal from their wives.


Whoa, whoa, whoa, there, buckaroo. Let's back on up here a second, alrighty?

First of all, regardless of it's merits (or lack thereof) as a movie, Brokeback Mountain is NOT a Western. It's nothing LIKE a Western. If Brokeback Mountain is a Western, then I'm Mary, Queen of Scots.

Just because the movie is set in a mountainous area and involves (I'm told) ranching and livestock and guys in cowboy hats who ride horses (among other things), that's no indication that the movie is a Western.

There are a few criteria for a movie to qualify as a Western, and Brokeback Mountain doesn't meet those criteria. As a fan of Westerns, I feel qualified to make the distinction. My favorite movie of all time is Unforgiven, and I've written a 10,000 page essay about it. I've seen more John Wayne movies and Clint Eastwood movies and Sam Peckinpah movies than I can shake a stick at. And, I enjoyed 'em. I enjoyed 'em quite a bit, and I enjoy watching them again when I get the chance. I can clear this up. I'm qualified for this job.

First of all, for a movie to be a Western, it must NOT tell the story of a man getting in touch with his feminine side. It must ABSOLUTELY NOT involve a man getting in touch with ANOTHER MAN'S feminine side... and it must ABSO-DAMN-LUTELY NOT tell the story of a man getting in touch with another man's backside. This is basic. Fundamental. There is no breaking this rule.

So, you see, right off the bat, Brokeback Mountain is not a Western.

Westerns aren't sensitive movies. They're not about sexual uncertainty, vulnerability, unexplored urges, or the sudden desire to rip Billy Bob's chaps off and plow the back forty, if you know what I mean.

Westerns aren't movies that make delicate affirmations.

Westerns aren't movies that open viewers up to consider alternative intimacies.
Westerns are movies about gritty, dirty people who smell bad and drink a lot and ride horses and occasionally end card-games by shooting one another.

Westerns are loud. Westerns are patriotic. Westerns are simple. Westerns are movies that make you want to play a harmonica, eat beans, brand cattle and protect Miss Susie's ranch from that damned double-crossing banker and his hired guns.

Nobody in a Western is allowed to ever tell another man that he's "never felt this way before." Ever. About anything. Nobody in a Western ever feels anything for the first time, and if he does, he gets drunk and shoots an extra.

There's been a lot of confusion about the idea of "gay cowboys" since Brokeback Mountain was released. Just for the sake of lucidity on this issue, here's a few visual aids that durn-well ought to clear things up:


GAY / COWBOY RATIO:
100% GAY.....0% COWBOY


The picture above is a "gay cowboy," according to the internet. This is one of the images that comes up if you go to Google Image Search and type in "gay cowboy." I DO NOT recommend doing that.





GAY / COWBOY RATIO:
70% GAY.....30% COWBOY


The guys above are Heath Ledger and Donnie Darko, the stars of Brokeback Mountain. I doubt that they're entirely gay... but I have had my doubts about Ledger ever since he broke up with Naomi Watts. No heterosexual male would break up with Naomi Watts.





GAY / COWBOY RATIO:
0% GAY.....100% COWBOY


This is a real cowboy. This guy started chewing tobacco in the bassinet. His bassinet was a hog trough. He once shot a man in Reno just to infringe on Johnny Cash's copyright. This guy is 100% straight. He doesn't know that homosexuality exists. He also doesn't know that toilet-paper exists.





GAY / COWBOY RATIO:
???% GAY.....???% COWBOY


This is John Travolta. I have no desire to hear from his lawyer.





GAY / COWBOY RATIO:
60% GAY.....40% COWBOY


This is country-and-western singer Kenny Chesney. He's a hard one to pin down. He sings songs about women, so he didn't strike me as gay when I heard his music. But his music is awful. And the first time I saw a picture of him... I mean, look at the guy. He looks like he's ready to cuddle up with the guy in the first picture. Then, he got married to Renee Zellweger and I thought, that seals it. He's definitely gay. Because Renee Zellweger looks like an undernourished Hungarian boy, right? Then, he got divorced from Renee Zellweger, so I got even more confused. Then I found out that he has an album called All I Want For Christmas Is A Real Good Tan, and I thought, yep, gay. Gay for sure.





GAY / COWBOY RATIO:
10% GAY.....90% COWBOY


This is Clint Eastwood. Eastwood is my hero, so it pains me to admit that I have a reason to believe that he's ten percent gay.

I hope it's clear that my intention here is not to knock Brokeback Mountain. The movie is getting it's share of heat, and I'll admit to having made fun of it in an around the water cooler environment. Nonetheless, I haven't seen the movie, so I can't condemn it. My wife saw it and she loved it. That's fine. Nonetheless, I'm not interested in the subject matter. Besides, I think that Heath Ledger's acting skills are such that, if you pushed him off a cliff, he couldn't "act" like he was falling. I don't plan to see the film, but I'm willing to concede that, as likely as not, it's "cinematically correct."

That's all well and good.

But it ain't no Western.

Hit counter

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
Funny things are afoot with my hit counter tonight. Google is sending a ton of traffic my way from people searching for "Tim Kaine eyebrow" and "Virginia governor eyebrow" and similar variations on that theme. I guess America has noticed.

NEWSFLASH: Christians Yadda Yadda Yadda

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006


OK, I'm the first to admit it... I'm a closed-minded, egotistical jerk. There, that's out in the open, there shouldn't be any need to debate that particular issue any further.

Having said that, I have to say that sometimes I just sit here, slack-jawed and dazed, when I read some of the things that reporters in the mainstream media write about Christians and Christianity.

Sometimes, I don't even need to read the stories. Sometimes, all I need to see are the headlines:



Yeah, that's a real shocker, there. Usually he screams about all the people he hates (in German) and throws things.



WHAT??!? Noooo! Surly you jest! Racism and Christianity aren't the same thing? Really? What about discrimination against cripples? We can still do that, right??



Oh, those crazy Christians with their hairbrained schemes. Next thing you know, they'll be wanting to build churches.



Good question. I mean, after all, they live in a culture known for supporting and encouraging religious diversity and for promoting womens' rights. Yet, they still cling to the beliefs of the heavily-armed terrorists that they're married to. What's up with that?

Like I said, I'm a closed-minded, egotistical jerk. Sue me.

It’s No Longer Always Red Lights and Sirens - Firehouse.com News

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
It's No Longer Always Red Lights and Sirens - Firehouse.com News:
In St. Louis, Salt Lake City and Anne Arundel County, Maryland, those fire trucks and ambulances blending in with normal traffic just may be headed to an incident.



While flashing lights and screaming sirens are the norm in most jurisdictions, some officials are taking a long, hard look at response methods, as the number of crashes involving emergency vehicles continues to rise.



In 2004, the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation listed emergency responses as one of the 16 Life Safety Initiatives that need to be addressed to reduce the number of fire and rescue personnel killed.



But, some areas such as St. Louis and Salt Lake City are ahead of the game. Both have had "reduced response" policies in place for many years. And, Anne Arundel county adopted the procedure a few months ago.



"Every call to 9-1-1 doesn't generate an emergency response," said Capt. Steve Simpson, CHIEF medical officer for the St. Louis Fire Department.




When I first caught sight of this article, I thought they were getting rid of emergency response all together. However, that is not what this article is about at all.



The article states how several fire departments have combated accidents which occurred during emergency response. They have instituted a tiered response. Tiered response basically groups calls into three responses: Hot, warm, and cold. Hot - everything runs lights and sirens, Warm - just the first due runs emergency and the second due runs silent, and Cold - silent response. For example Structure fires = Hot, ALS calls = Hot, Broken arm = warm (possibly), bloody nose = cold. Of course any officer can upgrade or downgrade the response. This is just a guideline. I think it is a good idea, although I do not think we have a problem with accidents during emergency response. This might be an effective program to be proactive to an issue other Departments are facing.



Roanoke Fire-EMS Responds to 4 Fires Over the Weekend

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
I had previously posted on two of these fires, including pictures from one of them (scroll down to previous posts). Here are the details from Roanoke Fire-EMS on the fires.



Residential structure fire on January 27, 2006 at 813 Day Ave.



The call was received through the 9-1-1 Center at approximately 3:42 a.m. The call was upgraded to a second alarm fire. The response of six Engines, two Ladder trucks, three Medic Units, one EMS Captain, one Investigative Unit, the Fire Marshal, the Assistant Fire Marshal, two Administrative Chiefs, and two Battalion Chiefs for a total of 39 personnel responded to the scene. The fire was deemed under control at 6:44 a.m.



Upon arrival, crews found heavy smoke and fire coming from the structure. When crews gained entry to the residence they were met with heavy heat and fire conditions which forced them to exit the structure and make an exterior attack. The fire extended to the second floor and roof. The fire then spread to adjacent buildings on the left and right side. The exposure at 809 Day Ave. sustained minor interior damage and the exposure at 815 Day Ave. sustained no interior damage, but minor exterior damage.



No one was inside the building when the fire started. There were no injuries to civilians. A firefighter sustained minor injuries after falling through the floor. He was treated at the scene and then returned to firefighting duties shortly after.



The cause and the origin of the fire are still under investigation. At this time the structure has been ruled unsafe to enter, suspending the investigation. When conditions improve, the investigation into the cause of the fire will resume. Preliminary damage estimates are approximately $65,000.



Residential structure fire on January 27, 2006 at 1026 Campbell Ave.



The call was received through the 9-1-1 Center at approximately 11:40 p.m. The response of three Engines, two Ladder trucks, two Medic Units, one EMS Captain, one Investigative Unit and two Battalion Chiefs for a total of 26 personnel responded to the scene. The fire was quickly under control at 12:22 a.m.



Upon arrival, crews found the residence engulfed in fire with heavy smoke showing. Crews aggressively extinguished the blaze and conducted a primary search of the structure to make sure that there weren't any victims trapped inside.



No one was inside the building when the fire started. There were no injuries to civilians or Fire-EMS personnel.



The cause and the origin of the fire are still under investigation. Preliminary damage estimates are approximately $25,000.



Residential structure fire on January 29, 2006 at 1502 7th St.



The call was received through the 9-1-1 Center at approximately 9:27 p.m. The response of three Engines, one Ladder truck, two Medic Units, one EMS Captain, one Investigative Unit and two Battalion Chiefs for a total of 23 personnel responded to the scene. The fire was quickly under control at 10:03 p.m.



Upon arrival, crews found heavy smoke and fire coming from the structure. Crews gained entrance to the residence and quickly extinguished the blaze.



No one was inside the building when the fire started. There were no injuries to civilians or Fire-EMS personnel.



The cause and the origin of the fire are still under investigation. Preliminary damage estimates are approximately $65,000.



Residential structure fire on January 30, 2006 at 5216 Lancelot Ln.



The call was received through the 9-1-1 Center at approximately 7:37 p.m. The response of two Engines, one Ladder truck, one Medic Unit, one EMS Captain, one Investigative Unit and one Battalion Chief for a total of 16 personnel responded to the scene. The fire was quickly under control at 7:47 p.m.



Upon arrival crews found light smoke coming from the front door of the apartment. After gaining entrance, fire crews found a stove and cabinet on fire. The fire was quickly extinguished with a water extinguisher by Fire-EMS personnel.



There were three people inside of the apartment when the fire started. They all escaped without any injuries. There were no injuries to Fire-EMS personnel.



The fire started on the stove and was contained to the kitchen. The cause of the fire was unattended food on the stove. Preliminary damage estimates are approximately $5,000.

Live blogging the SOTU

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006
JR will be live-blogging the State of the Union address tonight over at Bearing Drift.