Racism as defined by WSU
Wednesday, December 20th, 2006I seems that the quality of education at Washington State University hasn’t changed since I attended. The sentiments shown here by Professor Streamas are very similar to those I heard being taught in the late 80’s and early 90’s.
“he (Prof. Streamas) argues that a person of color cannot be racist, by definition, because racism also defines a power differential that is not usually present when a person or color is speaking.” - The Volokh Conspiracy
A similar theme was present in the Women’s Studies program when I attended WSU. Any suggestion that a woman could be sexist was loudly and aggressively shouted down. It was taken as fact that no woman, by definition, could be sexist. I would have considered the theory that it’s less likely in women, but impossible? That’s just ridiculous.
Professor Streamas’ theory is just as absurd. While in his statement he says that the power differential is “not usually present” when a person of color speaks, this somehow turns this into an absolute when defining racism. Racism unusual in people of color? Sure, I’d accept that. Rare? No problem. A person of color cannot be racist? That’s an absurd argument.
Maybe Prof. Streamas isn’t aware of it, but “people of color” aren’t in the minority everywhere in the world. Is he arguing that because people of color were oppressed on some areas, they are incapable of racism in other areas? Has he considered the behavior of one minority race towards other minority races right here in the US? I somehow doubt it. The fact that Prof. Streamas used this idea as a defense, when he himself was accused of racist language, is when this story gets bizarre. According to him, he couldn’t have had any racist intent when calling a student a “white shitbag”. He’s a professor, the student is in an inferior position, and Streamas used racial terms to define his verbal attack… How is this not racist? I think the official reprimand was entirely appropriate.
h/t Instapundit.com