Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Call For Change

Sunday, October 29th, 2006
You can't miss that big red graphic that just popped up on your right! The calling was easy and well-organized....

Webb & Warner in Floyd

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

Last Thursday also included a stop in Floyd for Gov. Warner and Jim Webb.

Colleen was there and has posted a wonderful account of the event and some photos. The crowd, she says, was “standing room only” in Floyd’s Country Store.

The RT’s Michael Sluss was also in attendance in Floyd and reported this great quote:

Even though Allen won 63 percent of the Floyd County vote in his 1993 gubernatorial election and his 2000 Senate campaign, Webb said he will concede none of Southwest Virginia to his rival.

Sen. Allen has probably realized by now that he cannot compete with Jim Webb in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. Because of that, Sen. Allen knows he will have to be very strong in Southwest Virginia and other rural areas. This year, though, I hope he is not counting on 63% from Floyd because I feel certain that Webb-supporters like Colleen are not going to let that happen.

Sen. Allen has had six years to do something to help Southwest Virginia. Instead of working to help us, he has been busy posturing for a run at the Whitehouse in 2008. We are ready for a senator that puts us first, instead of himself.

Webb, Boucher, & Warner in Bristol

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

On Thursday, October 26, 2006, Jim Webb visited Bristol and found a large crowd of supporters. I was working and unable to attend. But, two local-bloggers were in attendance and I assume reports from them are forthcoming. If not, and Webb fails to carry Bristol next week, we will know who to blame, right? :)

Another local-blogger, Sarah Williams, was also working and unable to attend, but she does point us to some photos taken by Kim Willis.

It looks (from Kim’s photos) and sounds like it was a fantastic event with a large and energized crowd.

I was joking about blaming Neal and Justin, but putting all jokes aside, if we want Webb to win, then now is the time for us to start making phone calls, handing out flyers, etc.

Going to vote on Election Day is very important, but we cannot expect to win if we are unwilling to do something more than that this year. Let’s get busy and elect Jim Webb!

Protect the children?

Tuesday, October 24th, 2006
100_0472 Originally uploaded by Thirdlayer. Churches under the constitutions of the United States and of Virginia enjoy a tax...

Protect the children?

Tuesday, October 24th, 2006
100_0472 Originally uploaded by Thirdlayer. Churches under the constitutions of the United States and of Virginia enjoy a tax...

Change under pressure

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Sunrise_9When things are going great, there's little pressure to do things differently.  We've all seen it.  Great results in business or politics can hide some really serious problems.  Usually by the time the hidden problems are uncovered, things have unraveled to the point that disaster can be just around the corner.

I've been in companies during great times and bad times.  The truth is that companies, like governments or even individual operate a little better when everything isn't going their way.  They become more open to exploring alternatives or looking at things from a different perspective.

We gotten to be a society where it's hard to admit you're wrong without supposedly losing face. Yet I believe failure only counts against you if you don't learn from it.  In the post, "On being an observer," I said the following.

The great who have never failed are probably not so great...

Not owning up to your failures or mistakes is not part of the recipe for success that a leader should follow.

Of course we all know far too well the example of the current administration in Washington which has refused to admit any mistakes in the Iraq war.  If appears that "Stay the course" has finally been retired, not because of any willingness to admit mistakes, but because it appears the Republican majority is in danger of disappearing.  This was in the Washington Post this morning.

But the White House is cutting and running from "stay the course." A phrase meant to connote steely resolve instead has become a symbol for being out of touch and rigid in the face of a war that seems to grow worse by the week, Republican strategists say. Democrats have now turned "stay the course" into an attack line in campaign commercials, and the Bush team is busy explaining that "stay the course" does not actually mean stay the course.

Businesses are no different.  They often blindly follow strategies because there is more ego involved than business savvy.  It's easy for a CEO to cruise along with business strategies whose only tests are the current quarter.  Yet businesses are different from government in one important distinction. 

Businesses, even large ones, sometimes change strategies like individuals change clothing.  Government, however,  is like a huge container ship.  Change is really hard in government.  Once the ship of state is going in one direction, getting it moving in another direction takes some serious pressure, something on the order of a disappearing majority.

As individuals, we often face the need to change without the resources to accomplish that change.

No matter what the situation, those who accept their own fallibility are much more likely to implement successful change.  It will be interesting to see how much change the coming election can bring to our government. 

We certainly have plenty of American companies who desperately need to change. 

Personally I'm hoping to change careers during the next year. So far it hasn't been easy, but my hope is that I'll respond as I have in previous pressure situations.  After all, the change from being a cattle breeder to a technology sales manager was not exactly an easy one.

I know one thing, I'm approaching my new career, chronicled in "You can teach an old dog new tricks," knowing that I have a lot to learn.  I've seen enough folks pretending to have all the answers to understand that it's a road to failure, even if it takes a long time to show up.

 

Change under pressure

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Sunrise_9When things are going great, there's little pressure to do things differently.  We've all seen it.  Great results in business or politics can hide some really serious problems.  Usually by the time the hidden problems are uncovered, things have unraveled to the point that disaster can be just around the corner.

I've been in companies during great times and bad times.  The truth is that companies, like governments or even individual operate a little better when everything isn't going their way.  They become more open to exploring alternatives or looking at things from a different perspective.

We gotten to be a society where it's hard to admit you're wrong without supposedly losing face. Yet I believe failure only counts against you if you don't learn from it.  In the post, "On being an observer," I said the following.

The great who have never failed are probably not so great...

Not owning up to your failures or mistakes is not part of the recipe for success that a leader should follow.

Of course we all know far too well the example of the current administration in Washington which has refused to admit any mistakes in the Iraq war.  If appears that "Stay the course" has finally been retired, not because of any willingness to admit mistakes, but because it appears the Republican majority is in danger of disappearing.  This was in the Washington Post this morning.

But the White House is cutting and running from "stay the course." A phrase meant to connote steely resolve instead has become a symbol for being out of touch and rigid in the face of a war that seems to grow worse by the week, Republican strategists say. Democrats have now turned "stay the course" into an attack line in campaign commercials, and the Bush team is busy explaining that "stay the course" does not actually mean stay the course.

Businesses are no different.  They often blindly follow strategies because there is more ego involved than business savvy.  It's easy for a CEO to cruise along with business strategies whose only tests are the current quarter.  Yet businesses are different from government in one important distinction. 

Businesses, even large ones, sometimes change strategies like individuals change clothing.  Government, however,  is like a huge container ship.  Change is really hard in government.  Once the ship of state is going in one direction, getting it moving in another direction takes some serious pressure, something on the order of a disappearing majority.

As individuals, we often face the need to change without the resources to accomplish that change.

No matter what the situation, those who accept their own fallibility are much more likely to implement successful change.  It will be interesting to see how much change the coming election can bring to our government. 

We certainly have plenty of American companies who desperately need to change. 

Personally I'm hoping to change careers during the next year. So far it hasn't been easy, but my hope is that I'll respond as I have in previous pressure situations.  After all, the change from being a cattle breeder to a technology sales manager was not exactly an easy one.

I know one thing, I'm approaching my new career, chronicled in "You can teach an old dog new tricks," knowing that I have a lot to learn.  I've seen enough folks pretending to have all the answers to understand that it's a road to failure, even if it takes a long time to show up.

 

Change under pressure

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

Sunrise_9When things are going great, there's little pressure to do things differently.  We've all seen it.  Great results in business or politics can hide some really serious problems.  Usually by the time the hidden problems are uncovered, things have unraveled to the point that disaster can be just around the corner.

I've been in companies during great times and bad times.  The truth is that companies, like governments or even individual operate a little better when everything isn't going their way.  They become more open to exploring alternatives or looking at things from a different perspective.

We gotten to be a society where it's hard to admit you're wrong without supposedly losing face. Yet I believe failure only counts against you if you don't learn from it.  In the post, "On being an observer," I said the following.

The great who have never failed are probably not so great...

Not owning up to your failures or mistakes is not part of the recipe for success that a leader should follow.

Of course we all know far too well the example of the current administration in Washington which has refused to admit any mistakes in the Iraq war.  If appears that "Stay the course" has finally been retired, not because of any willingness to admit mistakes, but because it appears the Republican majority is in danger of disappearing.  This was in the Washington Post this morning.

But the White House is cutting and running from "stay the course." A phrase meant to connote steely resolve instead has become a symbol for being out of touch and rigid in the face of a war that seems to grow worse by the week, Republican strategists say. Democrats have now turned "stay the course" into an attack line in campaign commercials, and the Bush team is busy explaining that "stay the course" does not actually mean stay the course.

Businesses are no different.  They often blindly follow strategies because there is more ego involved than business savvy.  It's easy for a CEO to cruise along with business strategies whose only tests are the current quarter.  Yet businesses are different from government in one important distinction. 

Businesses, even large ones, sometimes change strategies like individuals change clothing.  Government, however,  is like a huge container ship.  Change is really hard in government.  Once the ship of state is going in one direction, getting it moving in another direction takes some serious pressure, something on the order of a disappearing majority.

As individuals, we often face the need to change without the resources to accomplish that change.

No matter what the situation, those who accept their own fallibility are much more likely to implement successful change.  It will be interesting to see how much change the coming election can bring to our government. 

We certainly have plenty of American companies who desperately need to change. 

Personally I'm hoping to change careers during the next year. So far it hasn't been easy, but my hope is that I'll respond as I have in previous pressure situations.  After all, the change from being a cattle breeder to a technology sales manager was not exactly an easy one.

I know one thing, I'm approaching my new career, chronicled in "You can teach an old dog new tricks," knowing that I have a lot to learn.  I've seen enough folks pretending to have all the answers to understand that it's a road to failure, even if it takes a long time to show up.

 

Boucher TV ad

Monday, October 23rd, 2006

I caught Congressman Boucher’s new TV ad during the Today show yesterday.




The Congressman will certainly be re-elected and I am glad he is taking this opportunity to remind Southwest Virginians how hard he works for us every day.

Ford v. Corker

Sunday, October 22nd, 2006

The Tennessee senate race has showed us one thing: if you make false and negative attacks ads about your opponent’s family, be ready for a visit by him.




I cannot blame Ford for getting tired of his family being attacked by Mr. Corker. Good job by going to talk about it.

Trends to watch?

Saturday, October 21st, 2006

Ben has this post up in which he suggests we should keep an eye on Delegate Bill Carrico’s district. He says:

When Delegate Bill Carrico loses his race for Congress- look at the precincts in his House of Delegates district. If he doesn’t carry that district, watch out for a strong Democrat to come forward.

I have not heard who will challenge Carrico in 2007, but it will certainly be great seeing Congressman Boucher carry Carrico’s district.

So much for Corker

Friday, October 20th, 2006

As if anyone in Southwest Virginia (i.e., Tri-cities media market) ever wanted to know anything else about Bob Corker or Congressman Harold Ford, here is the latest flip-flop from Corker:




Looks like Mr. Corker is just not cut out to be in the U.S. Senate.

Vote for Harold Ford, Jr.

And don’t forget Jim Webb, as if you could!

Right?

Friday, October 20th, 2006
Republican Woes Lead to Feuding by Conservatives By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK Published: October 20, 2006 WASHINGTON, Oct. 19 — Tax-cutters...

Selling at a loss

Thursday, October 19th, 2006
If someone gave me an old piano and it did not work and I had to hire someone to haul...

Voting “No” on the Virginia Marriage Amendment

Wednesday, October 18th, 2006
For people who can't find or don't have time to look up the current Virginia law on same-sex marriages, here...

Low turn-out in Southwest Virginia?

Tuesday, October 17th, 2006

The BDT has this:

So far, only 61 absentee ballots have been cast in Buchanan County, and only 115 applications have been requested in Tazewell County.

. . .

“It’s real slow,” Buchanan County Registrar Vickie Clevinger said. “We’ve only had 68 so far. I think it’s going to be real slow this year. Unless they show up at the polls, they aren’t voting absentee like they normally do. We normally average at least 200 — even on a slow year.”

I have to believe that Allen will be helped by a low turn-out. These numbers are not doing anything to help Webb. Only 61 have been cast in Buchanan County with a special election for a Supervisor seat on the ballot? That is not a good sign.

Allen broke promise to LWVVA

Tuesday, October 17th, 2006

Prior to the Senate debate on October 9, 2006, hosted by the League of Women Voters of Virginia, both candidates executed no-use agreements.

Jim Webb has honored his agreement to the LWVVA and not used any of the debate footage for campaign purposes.

George Allen, on the other hand, within five days of the debate, began running a television ad that included footage from the debate. Allen’s improper use of the footage not only violated the agreement he had entered into, but by using the footage he broke his promise to the LWVVA.

Will George Allen cease using the footage and apologize? I doubt it, but I do hope voters in Virginia will show him that we want a senator who can keep a promise.

More here.

Another new poll

Sunday, October 15th, 2006

Another day, another new poll.

The new Washington Post poll has Allen at 49% and Webb with 47%, within the 3% margin of error.

This race is really going to come down to who can get the voters out better on Election Day.

The article includes some interesting info too.

On Allen:

But there are serious doubts about Allen in the poll. The percentage of voters who say they don’t like Allen has increased dramatically from a year ago, and 43 percent now say they have an unfavorable opinion of him.

. . .

And nearly one in five polled say they feel Allen was being intentionally racist when he called an Indian American supporter of Webb “macaca.”

Could this race be closer than Deeds v. McDonnell in 2005? Are we ready for more recounts?

Warner will not seek Democratic Nomination

Thursday, October 12th, 2006

Mark Warner announced today that he will not seek the Democratic nomination for President in 2008.

It looks like it will be at least 2012 before we get to see a Virginian on the ballot for president. I guess the good news is that this will free Warner up to run for the Senate in 2008, assuming Sen. John Warner does indeed retire.

This could also shake things up for 2009. Warner could run for Governor again, leaving Creigh Deeds and Brian Moran to challenge for the Attorney General’s office.

John McCain at Captain’s Quarters

Wednesday, October 11th, 2006

Senator John McCain is guest blogging at the Captain’s Quarters. He pulls no punches about how things should be done, and how they’ve been done in the past.

Time for Decisive Action on North Korea

They have missiles, and now they claim to have tested a nuclear device. Eventually they will have the technology to put warheads on missiles. That is a grave threat to South Korea, Japan and the United States that we cannot under any circumstances accept. North Korea also has a record of transferring weapons technology to other rogue nations, such as Iran and Syria.

The President is right to call on the Council to impose a military arms embargo, financial and trade sanctions, and, most importantly, the right to interdict and inspect all cargo in and out of North Korea. I hope the Council quickly adopts these sanctions, and that all members enforce them.

Now, we must, at long last, stop reinforcing failure with failure.