According to today’s edition of the Smyth County News & Messenger, the Smyth County Board of Supervisors took some positive action at their Tuesday meeting on the courthouse security/renovation project. Supervisors on a 5-2 vote (Blevins-(D), Neitch-(R), Dishner-(R), Slemp-(R), Clark-(D) in favor and Roberts-(D), Perry-(D) opposing) endorsed courthouse “concept 3″ with a $16 Million price tag. Supervisors apparently came to the realization if they did not endorse a plan the “sky would be the limit on the cost” if the judges took over the whole process. Still, according to the paper, the judges will have to sign off on all that the county does at this juncture.
Concept 3 (the most expensive of the plans) will entail a full renovation and northward expansion of the Smyth County Courthouse. This will almost double the courthouse in size. Under the plan the existing 30 year old former Smyth County Jail building will be demolished. The plan will add a 4th courtroom to the building and maintain/expand offices for the sheriff, 911 center, commissioner of the revenue, treasurer, and Commonwealth’s attorney in the courthouse. Security issues will also be addressed by having only 1 public entrance and prisoner holding facilities/sally-port in the courthouse.
However, concept 3 has flaws. According to the report it will only meet projected needs for the Smyth courts for 20 years. This troubled Supervisors Roberts and Perry in that they did not like the 20 year time frame or how the project is going to be paid for (which remains to be seen). According to Supervisor Perry in the article, who was around as I believe Smyth County Administrator in the 1970’s when the last renovation was done, that renovation was supposed to outlive him.
One other critical problem not addressed in concept 3 is what to do with parking and temporary office spaces during construction. If the courthouse expands northward, almost all of the precious and limited parking spaces around the courthouse will be no more. On any given court day it is very difficult to find a parking space around the courthouse or Downtown Marion. In addition, new shops and businesses, are opening around the courthouse and taking up parking. During the construction phase parking and access to the courthouse will be more troubling. It is likely temporary office and courtroom space will have to be acquired elsewhere.
I’m glad the Supervisors took some decisive action. At least they have taken a stand and decided on a plan of their own choosing and not being forced by the judges to take one. What remains to be seen is how to pay for it and what to do with its flaws. Something needs to be done because the courthouse is in bad, if not terrible, condition.