<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Southwest Virginia Blogs</title>
	<link>http://swvanews.com</link>
	<description>An aggregator for blogs from Southwest Virginia</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>An Epitaph</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/an-epitaph/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/an-epitaph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834578386032587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was always something I never felt comfortable about when it came to former President Gerald Ford. It had to do with the friends he kept:Enough SaidRichmond Times-DispatchFormer Senator George McGovern, the Democrats' 1972 presidential nominee, in...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >There was always something I never felt comfortable about when it came to former President Gerald Ford. It had to do with the friends he kept:</span><br /><span ><br />
<blockquote><span ><strong>Enough Said<br /></strong>Richmond Times-Dispatch</p>
<p>Former Senator George McGovern, the Democrats&#8217; 1972 presidential nominee, in a television interview following the funeral of Gerald Ford: &#8220;I have to tell you something I&#8217;ve never said before publicly. I voted for him in 1976.&#8221; (</span><a href="http://timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD%2FMGArticle%2FRTD_BasicArticle&#038;c=MGArticle&amp;cid=1149192552334&#038;path=%21editorials&amp;s=1045855934983"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span> </p></blockquote>
<p></span><span >With friends like this &#8230;</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/an-epitaph/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make &#8216;Em Howl</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/make-em-howl/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/make-em-howl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834464372501093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Ever wonder why we here in Virginia complain so vociferously about property tax rates?  



For the same reason we don't complain about income tax rates.  One tax is collected surreptitiously at time of payment of paychecks in the form of withholding...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span >Ever wonder why we here in Virginia complain so vociferously about property tax rates?  </span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >For the same reason we don&#8217;t complain about income tax rates.  One tax is collected surreptitiously at time of payment of paychecks in the form of withholding.  The other, though sometimes buried in mortgage payments, comes due all at once.</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >And boy do people complain.</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Well, Governor Kaine here in the commonwealth has just introduced a plan to combat high property tax bills.  His proposal is of no great consequence and will have negligible effect on your property tax bill so I&#8217;ll just link to it </span><br />
<a href="http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20070108-111423-1078r.htm"><br />
<span >here</span><br />
</a><br />
<span > and leave it at that.</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >More importantly, the underlying reason for all the hand-wringing is the very reason why I have advocated the elimination of both property taxes and income taxes (and luxury taxes and capital gains taxes and gasoline taxes and &#8230;):</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Roll all the taxes into one - the sales tax.</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >People will then come to suddenly - and shockingly - realize what they pay to have their government do all the goofy and wasteful things it does.</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >And boy will they howl.</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Then, only then, will they do something about the monster we&#8217;ve created in Richmond.</span>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/make-em-howl/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War Will Go On</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/the-war-will-go-on/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/the-war-will-go-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834196282843022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that much of America has tired of the war on terror, the terrorists continue their relentless assault on the civilized world. And as much as Americans want to forget it, President Bush doesn't. And won't:U.S. Airstrike Aims at Qaeda Ce...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >Despite the fact that much of America has tired of the war on terror, the terrorists continue their relentless assault on the civilized world. And as much as Americans want to forget it, President Bush doesn&#8217;t. And won&#8217;t:</span><br /><span ><br />
<blockquote><span ><strong>U.S. Airstrike Aims at Qaeda Cell in Somalia<br /></strong>By </span><span >David S. Cloud, The New York Times</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Washington, Jan. 8 — A United States Air Force gunship carried out a strike Sunday night against suspected operatives of Al Qaeda in southern Somalia, a senior Pentagon official said Monday night.</span></p>
<p><span >The attack by an AC-130 gunship, which is operated by the Special Forces Command, is believed to have produced multiple casualties, the official said. It was not known Monday night whether the casualties included members of a Qaeda cell that American officials have long suspected was hiding in Somalia.</span></p>
<p><span >Special Forces units operating from an American base in Djibouti are conducting a &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/world/africa/09somalia.html?hp&#038;ex=1168405200&amp;amp;en=cc4f29d01f65cf61&#038;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span> </p></blockquote>
<p></span><span >Iraq is but one of the battles raging around the world. It and they will be won.</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >I read the other day one of Virginia&#8217;s many small-minded bloggers dancing a jig over President Bush&#8217;s popularity rating.  What he&#8217;ll never understand is the fact that the our President could give a damn.  George Bush will tell you that, since 9/11, his overriding purpose is to protect the American people, whether they want it or not.  Whether they like him for it or not.</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >We can - and will - do a lot worse.</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/the-war-will-go-on/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dont  Flinch</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dont-flinch/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dont-flinch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>One Wise Girl</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7172886.post-116834058782085144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Last night during the blow out game (ouch Ohio State) I saw the most amazing commercial featuring NASCAR racers Dale Earnhardt Jr. (8), Jeff Gordon ( 24) and Jimmy Johnson (48). One of the things I appreciate about the NASCAR family is just how down home all these racing teams are but in this ad they become larger then life characters that turn into...well, you better watch it for yourself but]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Last night during the blow out game (ouch Ohio State) I saw the most amazing commercial featuring NASCAR racers Dale Earnhardt Jr. (8), Jeff Gordon ( 24) and Jimmy Johnson (48). One of the things I appreciate about the NASCAR family is just how down home all these racing teams are but in this ad they become larger then life characters that turn into&#8230;well, you better watch it for yourself but
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dont-flinch/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elon Builds More than Rockets!</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/elon-builds-more-than-rockets/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/elon-builds-more-than-rockets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JackKennedy</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24755163.post-3547247992112093231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ SpaceX CEO Elon Musk co-founded a Silicon Valley start-up known as Tesla Motors. The new firm with 70-employees is building a mass-market electric sportscar that looks a little more like a Ferrari than a Prius.  It is almost rocket science to get 125 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/6820/3981/1600/4186/home_r1_c1.jpg"><img  alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/6820/3981/1600/4186/home_r1_c1.jpg" border="0" /></a> SpaceX CEO Elon Musk co-founded a Silicon Valley start-up known as <strong><a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/index.php?js_enabled=1">Tesla Motors</a></strong>. The new firm with 70-employees is building a mass-market electric sportscar that looks a little more like a Ferrari than a Prius.  It is almost rocket science to get 125 miles per gallon in the <strong><a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/styling/body.php">hot ride!<br /></a></strong>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/elon-builds-more-than-rockets/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dither, Dither, Slink, &#038; Slither</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834091636310364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:Democrats Split Over Iraq ApproachBy Jeff Zeleny, The New York TimesWashingto...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >It&#8217;s been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:</span><br /><span ><br />
<blockquote>
<p><span ><strong>Democrats Split Over Iraq Approach</strong><br />By Jeff Zeleny, The New York Times</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Washington, Jan. 8 — The new Democratic majority in Congress is divided over how to assert its power in opposing President Bush’s plan to send more troops to Baghdad, as leaders explore ways to block financing for a military expansion without being accused of abandoning American forces already in Iraq. </span></p>
<p><span >While Democrats find themselves unusually united in their resistance to a troop increase, party leaders are locked in an internal debate over how far to go in objecting to the administration’s Iraq strategy. </span></p>
<p><span >The White House has invited some Democrats to meet with Mr. Bush before he gives his Iraq speech on Wednesday, even as others have scoured the history books to find cases when Congress has reined in the commander in chief. </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Harry Reid of Nevada, vowed Monday “to take a look at it.” </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >“I don’t think we should be pulling back any funds,” said Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat&#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Mr. Reid, who said on Dec. 17 that he would support a plan for a temporary increase in increase troops. Two weeks later, he announced his opposition &#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Representative Adam Smith of Washington, vice chairman of the moderate New Democratic Coalition, said he feared that &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/world/middleeast/09dems.html?hp&#038;ex=1168405200&amp;amp;amp;amp;en=b9d8b4f92fd9046f&#038;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p></span><span >Democrats. Boldly going where no man, uh, or woman or uh,person of trans-gender or uh, person of undecided gender has &#8230; well, maybe they have gone there before or maybe they have gone only part-way there and then turned back or maybe they didn&#8217;t even try to go there or maybe they took into account the implications of going there and decided reluctantly not to or &#8230;</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dither, Dither, Slink, &#038; Slither</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834091636310364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:Democrats Split Over Iraq ApproachBy Jeff Zeleny, The New York TimesWashingto...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >It&#8217;s been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:</span><br /><span ><br />
<blockquote>
<p><span ><strong>Democrats Split Over Iraq Approach</strong><br />By Jeff Zeleny, The New York Times</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Washington, Jan. 8 — The new Democratic majority in Congress is divided over how to assert its power in opposing President Bush’s plan to send more troops to Baghdad, as leaders explore ways to block financing for a military expansion without being accused of abandoning American forces already in Iraq. </span></p>
<p><span >While Democrats find themselves unusually united in their resistance to a troop increase, party leaders are locked in an internal debate over how far to go in objecting to the administration’s Iraq strategy. </span></p>
<p><span >The White House has invited some Democrats to meet with Mr. Bush before he gives his Iraq speech on Wednesday, even as others have scoured the history books to find cases when Congress has reined in the commander in chief. </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Harry Reid of Nevada, vowed Monday “to take a look at it.” </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >“I don’t think we should be pulling back any funds,” said Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat&#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Mr. Reid, who said on Dec. 17 that he would support a plan for a temporary increase in increase troops. Two weeks later, he announced his opposition &#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Representative Adam Smith of Washington, vice chairman of the moderate New Democratic Coalition, said he feared that &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/world/middleeast/09dems.html?hp&#038;ex=1168405200&amp;amp;amp;amp;en=b9d8b4f92fd9046f&#038;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p></span><span >Democrats. Boldly going where no man, uh, or woman or uh,person of trans-gender or uh, person of undecided gender has &#8230; well, maybe they have gone there before or maybe they have gone only part-way there and then turned back or maybe they didn&#8217;t even try to go there or maybe they took into account the implications of going there and decided reluctantly not to or &#8230;</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dither, Dither, Slink, &#038; Slither</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834091636310364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:Democrats Split Over Iraq ApproachBy Jeff Zeleny, The New York TimesWashingto...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >It&#8217;s been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:</span><br /><span ><br />
<blockquote>
<p><span ><strong>Democrats Split Over Iraq Approach</strong><br />By Jeff Zeleny, The New York Times</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Washington, Jan. 8 — The new Democratic majority in Congress is divided over how to assert its power in opposing President Bush’s plan to send more troops to Baghdad, as leaders explore ways to block financing for a military expansion without being accused of abandoning American forces already in Iraq. </span></p>
<p><span >While Democrats find themselves unusually united in their resistance to a troop increase, party leaders are locked in an internal debate over how far to go in objecting to the administration’s Iraq strategy. </span></p>
<p><span >The White House has invited some Democrats to meet with Mr. Bush before he gives his Iraq speech on Wednesday, even as others have scoured the history books to find cases when Congress has reined in the commander in chief. </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Harry Reid of Nevada, vowed Monday “to take a look at it.” </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >“I don’t think we should be pulling back any funds,” said Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat&#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Mr. Reid, who said on Dec. 17 that he would support a plan for a temporary increase in increase troops. Two weeks later, he announced his opposition &#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Representative Adam Smith of Washington, vice chairman of the moderate New Democratic Coalition, said he feared that &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/world/middleeast/09dems.html?hp&#038;ex=1168405200&amp;amp;amp;amp;en=b9d8b4f92fd9046f&#038;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p></span><span >Democrats. Boldly going where no man, uh, or woman or uh,person of trans-gender or uh, person of undecided gender has &#8230; well, maybe they have gone there before or maybe they have gone only part-way there and then turned back or maybe they didn&#8217;t even try to go there or maybe they took into account the implications of going there and decided reluctantly not to or &#8230;</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dither, Dither, Slink, &#038; Slither</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116834091636310364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:Democrats Split Over Iraq ApproachBy Jeff Zeleny, The New York TimesWashingto...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >It&#8217;s been so long since the Democrats were in charge in Washington, I had forgotten how ineffectual they go out of their way to be. The horror of it is starting to flood back:</span><br /><span ><br />
<blockquote>
<p><span ><strong>Democrats Split Over Iraq Approach</strong><br />By Jeff Zeleny, The New York Times</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Washington, Jan. 8 — The new Democratic majority in Congress is divided over how to assert its power in opposing President Bush’s plan to send more troops to Baghdad, as leaders explore ways to block financing for a military expansion without being accused of abandoning American forces already in Iraq. </span></p>
<p><span >While Democrats find themselves unusually united in their resistance to a troop increase, party leaders are locked in an internal debate over how far to go in objecting to the administration’s Iraq strategy. </span></p>
<p><span >The White House has invited some Democrats to meet with Mr. Bush before he gives his Iraq speech on Wednesday, even as others have scoured the history books to find cases when Congress has reined in the commander in chief. </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Harry Reid of Nevada, vowed Monday “to take a look at it.” </span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >“I don’t think we should be pulling back any funds,” said Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat&#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >&#8230; Mr. Reid, who said on Dec. 17 that he would support a plan for a temporary increase in increase troops. Two weeks later, he announced his opposition &#8230;</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Representative Adam Smith of Washington, vice chairman of the moderate New Democratic Coalition, said he feared that &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/world/middleeast/09dems.html?hp&#038;ex=1168405200&amp;amp;amp;amp;en=b9d8b4f92fd9046f&#038;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p></span><span >Democrats. Boldly going where no man, uh, or woman or uh,person of trans-gender or uh, person of undecided gender has &#8230; well, maybe they have gone there before or maybe they have gone only part-way there and then turned back or maybe they didn&#8217;t even try to go there or maybe they took into account the implications of going there and decided reluctantly not to or &#8230;</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/dither-dither-slink-slither/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eat The Rich</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/eat-the-rich/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/eat-the-rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116833993876786973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The following article originally appeared in the Roanoke Times on Thursday, November 30, 2006





Rising tide



By Jerry Fuhrman


"That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterp...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span >The following article originally appeared in the Roanoke Times on Thursday, November 30, 2006</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br></p>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
<span >Rising tide</span><br />
</strong>
</div>
<div align="center">
<span >By Jerry Fuhrman</span>
</div>
<p></br><br />
<span >&#8220;That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise.&#8221;</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8211; Abraham Lincoln, 1864</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8220;Probably the greatest harm done by vast wealth is the harm that we of moderate means do ourselves when we let the vices of envy and hatred enter deep into our own natures.&#8221;</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8211; Theodore Roosevelt, 1902</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >The election of 2006 is over. The dust is settling. The Democrats have won a decisive victory over their Republican opponents. The celebration begins. Power shifts. The platform takes shape. And, as if we learned nothing from the early &#8217;70s when the party then (and now) in power did its best to drive the wealthy among us into oblivion, and nearly destroyed the economy in the process, we find ourselves once again returning to the ugly politics of class envy.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >It first arose here in Virginia. Just days after James Webb won an upset victory over Sen. George Allen, Webb wrote a commentary for The Wall Street Journal in which he brought us the shocking revelation that some in this country have accumulated great wealth while others haven&#8217;t:</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8220;America&#8217;s top tier has grown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfair to say that they are literally living in a different country. Few among them send their children to public schools; fewer still send their loved ones to fight our wars. They own most of our stocks, making the stock market an unreliable indicator of the economic health of working people. The top 1 percent now takes in an astounding 16 percent of national income, up from 8 percent in 1980. The tax codes protect them, just as they protect corporate America, through a vast system of loopholes.&#8221;</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >What Webb plans to do about this situation wasn&#8217;t stated. But his having mentioned the tax code makes his intentions clear. Since the bottom 40 percent of wage-earners pay no federal income taxes, you can bet your life savings &#8212; at least the portion that he doesn&#8217;t intend to confiscate &#8212; who it is Webb plans on going after. The detested rich.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Then there&#8217;s Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel&#8217;s call for the reinstatement of the military draft. Traditional arguments in favor of forced conscription revolve around the fulfillment of manpower needs in the most expedient, if ultimately detrimental (think Vietnam), way. But if you listen to Rangel&#8217;s explanation, you come away with the understanding that his goal has nothing to do with improving the fighting effectiveness of our military; he simply wants Harvard and Yale students, those children of the pampered and pompous classes, to be dying in Iraq too. Feel the resentment:<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8220;Am I raising the class issue? You bet your life I am. Am I saying that the affluent and those that are hooked up politically are excluded from serving? You bet your life.&#8221;<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Blind, seething rancor. And a jaw-dropping misunderstanding of how our all-volunteer military is incorporated. How does drafting the wealthy improve the military? To him it doesn&#8217;t matter.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Closer to home, certain left-wing bloggers here in the commonwealth have taken up the cause too, not realizing the hypocrisy in their denouncing the war raging in Iraq and decrying the tragic loss of American lives, while at the same time demanding that the children of the rich share the experience. How depraved.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >It has been said, and I believe it to be true, that the key difference between conservatives and liberals is in their attitudes toward the rich. Conservatives work to make everyone someday wealthy. Liberals work to destroy wealth.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >I called a meeting of my sales team not long ago and in the course of my laying out the coming year&#8217;s plan, I told each of them: I intend, if you do your part, to make every one of you rich. In so doing, of course, I intend to enrich myself. For having succeeded, the corporation to which we all answer will prosper. As will its shareholders. And the families of each shareholder.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >As someone once said, &#8220;A rising tide raises all boats.&#8221; This will only happen, though, if there isn&#8217;t a tidal wave of class hatred sweeping over and capsizing us all.</span>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/eat-the-rich/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eat The Rich</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/eat-the-rich/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/eat-the-rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116833993876786973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The following article originally appeared in the Roanoke Times on Thursday, November 30, 2006





Rising tide



By Jerry Fuhrman


"That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterp...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span >The following article originally appeared in the Roanoke Times on Thursday, November 30, 2006</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span ></span><br />
<br /></br></p>
<div align="center">
<strong><br />
<span >Rising tide</span><br />
</strong>
</div>
<div align="center">
<span >By Jerry Fuhrman</span>
</div>
<p></br><br />
<span >&#8220;That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise.&#8221;</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8211; Abraham Lincoln, 1864</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8220;Probably the greatest harm done by vast wealth is the harm that we of moderate means do ourselves when we let the vices of envy and hatred enter deep into our own natures.&#8221;</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8211; Theodore Roosevelt, 1902</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >The election of 2006 is over. The dust is settling. The Democrats have won a decisive victory over their Republican opponents. The celebration begins. Power shifts. The platform takes shape. And, as if we learned nothing from the early &#8217;70s when the party then (and now) in power did its best to drive the wealthy among us into oblivion, and nearly destroyed the economy in the process, we find ourselves once again returning to the ugly politics of class envy.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >It first arose here in Virginia. Just days after James Webb won an upset victory over Sen. George Allen, Webb wrote a commentary for The Wall Street Journal in which he brought us the shocking revelation that some in this country have accumulated great wealth while others haven&#8217;t:</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8220;America&#8217;s top tier has grown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfair to say that they are literally living in a different country. Few among them send their children to public schools; fewer still send their loved ones to fight our wars. They own most of our stocks, making the stock market an unreliable indicator of the economic health of working people. The top 1 percent now takes in an astounding 16 percent of national income, up from 8 percent in 1980. The tax codes protect them, just as they protect corporate America, through a vast system of loopholes.&#8221;</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >What Webb plans to do about this situation wasn&#8217;t stated. But his having mentioned the tax code makes his intentions clear. Since the bottom 40 percent of wage-earners pay no federal income taxes, you can bet your life savings &#8212; at least the portion that he doesn&#8217;t intend to confiscate &#8212; who it is Webb plans on going after. The detested rich.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Then there&#8217;s Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel&#8217;s call for the reinstatement of the military draft. Traditional arguments in favor of forced conscription revolve around the fulfillment of manpower needs in the most expedient, if ultimately detrimental (think Vietnam), way. But if you listen to Rangel&#8217;s explanation, you come away with the understanding that his goal has nothing to do with improving the fighting effectiveness of our military; he simply wants Harvard and Yale students, those children of the pampered and pompous classes, to be dying in Iraq too. Feel the resentment:<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >&#8220;Am I raising the class issue? You bet your life I am. Am I saying that the affluent and those that are hooked up politically are excluded from serving? You bet your life.&#8221;<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Blind, seething rancor. And a jaw-dropping misunderstanding of how our all-volunteer military is incorporated. How does drafting the wealthy improve the military? To him it doesn&#8217;t matter.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >Closer to home, certain left-wing bloggers here in the commonwealth have taken up the cause too, not realizing the hypocrisy in their denouncing the war raging in Iraq and decrying the tragic loss of American lives, while at the same time demanding that the children of the rich share the experience. How depraved.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >It has been said, and I believe it to be true, that the key difference between conservatives and liberals is in their attitudes toward the rich. Conservatives work to make everyone someday wealthy. Liberals work to destroy wealth.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >I called a meeting of my sales team not long ago and in the course of my laying out the coming year&#8217;s plan, I told each of them: I intend, if you do your part, to make every one of you rich. In so doing, of course, I intend to enrich myself. For having succeeded, the corporation to which we all answer will prosper. As will its shareholders. And the families of each shareholder.<br /></br><br />
</span><br />
<br /></br><br />
<span >As someone once said, &#8220;A rising tide raises all boats.&#8221; This will only happen, though, if there isn&#8217;t a tidal wave of class hatred sweeping over and capsizing us all.</span>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/eat-the-rich/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Was Wrong</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116833891198673163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that a scientific discovery made public yesterday that found there to be no need to kill little babies at embryo stage for research purposes, the left demands they be killed anyway. I had written that they would now quietly drop the ji...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >Despite the fact that a scientific discovery made public yesterday that found there to be no need to kill little babies at embryo stage for research purposes, the left demands they be killed anyway. I had <a href="http://blogfromonhigh.blogspot.com/2007/01/it-was-never-about-stem-cells.html"><span >written</span></a> that they would now quietly drop the jihad against the fetus and move on to other battles.</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >I guess I should have known.</span></p>
<p><span ><br />
<blockquote><strong><span >All cells considered</span><br /></strong><span >Roanoke Times editorial</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Wake Forest University researchers discovered that developing fetuses shed cells into amniotic fluid that may be as useful in developing cures for devastating diseases as embryonic stem cells.<br /></span><br /><span >They claim the fetal cells in the amniotic fluid are as versatile as embryonic ones in their ability to morph into the type of tissue desired and are easier to control.</span></p>
<p><span >If, indeed, the amniotic cells live up to their promise, it is tempting to wish that this would end the political debate over the ethics and morality of using embryos for research even if they were already slated for destruction.</span></p>
<p><span >However, there is still much research to be conducted to rule out any possibilities, as &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/wb/99313"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span><br /><span ></span></p></blockquote>
<p></span><span ></span><br /></span><span >I should have paid closer attention to my own words. It has never been about the stem cells. It&#8217;s always been about the babies.</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Was Wrong</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116833891198673163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that a scientific discovery made public yesterday that found there to be no need to kill little babies at embryo stage for research purposes, the left demands they be killed anyway. I had written that they would now quietly drop the ji...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >Despite the fact that a scientific discovery made public yesterday that found there to be no need to kill little babies at embryo stage for research purposes, the left demands they be killed anyway. I had <a href="http://blogfromonhigh.blogspot.com/2007/01/it-was-never-about-stem-cells.html"><span >written</span></a> that they would now quietly drop the jihad against the fetus and move on to other battles.</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >I guess I should have known.</span></p>
<p><span ><br />
<blockquote><strong><span >All cells considered</span><br /></strong><span >Roanoke Times editorial</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Wake Forest University researchers discovered that developing fetuses shed cells into amniotic fluid that may be as useful in developing cures for devastating diseases as embryonic stem cells.<br /></span><br /><span >They claim the fetal cells in the amniotic fluid are as versatile as embryonic ones in their ability to morph into the type of tissue desired and are easier to control.</span></p>
<p><span >If, indeed, the amniotic cells live up to their promise, it is tempting to wish that this would end the political debate over the ethics and morality of using embryos for research even if they were already slated for destruction.</span></p>
<p><span >However, there is still much research to be conducted to rule out any possibilities, as &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/wb/99313"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span><br /><span ></span></p></blockquote>
<p></span><span ></span><br /></span><span >I should have paid closer attention to my own words. It has never been about the stem cells. It&#8217;s always been about the babies.</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Was Wrong</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Fuhrman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877858.post-116833891198673163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that a scientific discovery made public yesterday that found there to be no need to kill little babies at embryo stage for research purposes, the left demands they be killed anyway. I had written that they would now quietly drop the ji...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span >Despite the fact that a scientific discovery made public yesterday that found there to be no need to kill little babies at embryo stage for research purposes, the left demands they be killed anyway. I had <a href="http://blogfromonhigh.blogspot.com/2007/01/it-was-never-about-stem-cells.html"><span >written</span></a> that they would now quietly drop the jihad against the fetus and move on to other battles.</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >I guess I should have known.</span></p>
<p><span ><br />
<blockquote><strong><span >All cells considered</span><br /></strong><span >Roanoke Times editorial</span><br /><span ></span><br /><span >Wake Forest University researchers discovered that developing fetuses shed cells into amniotic fluid that may be as useful in developing cures for devastating diseases as embryonic stem cells.<br /></span><br /><span >They claim the fetal cells in the amniotic fluid are as versatile as embryonic ones in their ability to morph into the type of tissue desired and are easier to control.</span></p>
<p><span >If, indeed, the amniotic cells live up to their promise, it is tempting to wish that this would end the political debate over the ethics and morality of using embryos for research even if they were already slated for destruction.</span></p>
<p><span >However, there is still much research to be conducted to rule out any possibilities, as &#8230; (</span><a href="http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/wb/99313"><span >link</span></a><span >)</span><br /><span ></span></p></blockquote>
<p></span><span ></span><br /></span><span >I should have paid closer attention to my own words. It has never been about the stem cells. It&#8217;s always been about the babies.</span>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/i-was-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links to keep you busy</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/links-to-keep-you-busy/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/links-to-keep-you-busy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FireFleitz</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Fire Links</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11338009.post-5170396881365923200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links to keep you busy - Job Related

The Bravest Online
WiththeCommand.com
LAFD News &#038; Information
VAFireNews.com
SConFire.com
FireNews.Net
Firefighter Blog
USFirefighters.net
Firefighting.com
The Bravest.com
Nomex hoods to purchase if you are the Man of Steel, or Batman, or other Super heros
Firefighters Online
Firefighter Rescue Inc. 
Firefighting Links Dot Com

If you have any to add, put ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links to keep you busy - Job Related</p>
<p>The Bravest Online<br />
WiththeCommand.com<br />
LAFD News &#038; Information<br />
VAFireNews.com<br />
SConFire.com<br />
FireNews.Net<br />
Firefighter Blog<br />
USFirefighters.net<br />
Firefighting.com<br />
The Bravest.com<br />
Nomex hoods to purchase if you are the Man of Steel, or Batman, or other Super heros<br />
Firefighters Online<br />
Firefighter Rescue Inc.<br />
Firefighting Links Dot Com</p>
<p>If you have any to add, put
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/links-to-keep-you-busy/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links to keep you busy</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/links-to-keep-you-busy/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/links-to-keep-you-busy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FireFleitz</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Fire Links</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11338009.post-5170396881365923200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links to keep you busy - Job Related

The Bravest Online
WiththeCommand.com
LAFD News &#038; Information
VAFireNews.com
SConFire.com
FireNews.Net
Firefighter Blog
USFirefighters.net
Firefighting.com
The Bravest.com
Nomex hoods to purchase if you are the Man of Steel, or Batman, or other Super heros
Firefighters Online
Firefighter Rescue Inc. 
Firefighting Links Dot Com

If you have any to add, put ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links to keep you busy - Job Related</p>
<p>The Bravest Online<br />
WiththeCommand.com<br />
LAFD News &#038; Information<br />
VAFireNews.com<br />
SConFire.com<br />
FireNews.Net<br />
Firefighter Blog<br />
USFirefighters.net<br />
Firefighting.com<br />
The Bravest.com<br />
Nomex hoods to purchase if you are the Man of Steel, or Batman, or other Super heros<br />
Firefighters Online<br />
Firefighter Rescue Inc.<br />
Firefighting Links Dot Com</p>
<p>If you have any to add, put
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/links-to-keep-you-busy/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawking to be Tourist Astronaut</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/hawking-to-be-tourist-astronaut/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/hawking-to-be-tourist-astronaut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JackKennedy</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24755163.post-2180214006707540225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Renowed physicist StephenHawking will be a flyer aboard the suborbital SpaceShipTwo (SS2) 'Enterprise' in 2009 sponsored by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Galactic. Dr. Hawking, 65, has expressed the desire to fly suborbital during a BBC Radio 4 intervi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><a href="http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-330x270-science-stephen-hawking.jpg"><img  alt="" src="http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-330x270-science-stephen-hawking.jpg" border="0" /></a>Renowed physicist StephenHawking will be a flyer aboard the suborbital SpaceShipTwo (SS2) &#8216;Enterprise&#8217; in 2009 sponsored by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Galactic. <a href="http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2006/12/dr-who-going-to-space.html">Dr. Hawking, 65, </a>has expressed the desire to fly suborbital during a BBC Radio 4 interview in November of last year.</div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">Hawking uses a wheelchair and communicates with the help of a computer because he suffers from a neurological disorder called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has done groundbreaking research on black holes and the origins of the universe, proposing that space and time have no beginning and no end.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/hawking-to-be-tourist-astronaut/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawking to be Tourist Astronaut</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/hawking-to-be-tourist-astronaut/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/hawking-to-be-tourist-astronaut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JackKennedy</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Uncategorized</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24755163.post-2180214006707540225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Renowed physicist StephenHawking will be a flyer aboard the suborbital SpaceShipTwo (SS2) 'Enterprise' in 2009 sponsored by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Galactic. Dr. Hawking, 65, has expressed the desire to fly suborbital during a BBC Radio 4 intervi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><a href="http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-330x270-science-stephen-hawking.jpg"><img  alt="" src="http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-330x270-science-stephen-hawking.jpg" border="0" /></a>Renowed physicist StephenHawking will be a flyer aboard the suborbital SpaceShipTwo (SS2) &#8216;Enterprise&#8217; in 2009 sponsored by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Galactic. <a href="http://spaceports.blogspot.com/2006/12/dr-who-going-to-space.html">Dr. Hawking, 65, </a>has expressed the desire to fly suborbital during a BBC Radio 4 interview in November of last year.</div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify"></div>
<div align="justify">Hawking uses a wheelchair and communicates with the help of a computer because he suffers from a neurological disorder called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, has done groundbreaking research on black holes and the origins of the universe, proposing that space and time have no beginning and no end.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/09/hawking-to-be-tourist-astronaut/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuff roles downhill</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/08/stuff-roles-downhill/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/08/stuff-roles-downhill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FireFleitz</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Humor</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11338009.post-3576743472131944685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this picture was pretty funny. It was sent in by a reader, and is from Break.com.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this picture was pretty funny. It was sent in by a reader, and is from Break.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/08/stuff-roles-downhill/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuff roles downhill</title>
		<link>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/08/stuff-roles-downhill/</link>
		<comments>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/08/stuff-roles-downhill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FireFleitz</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Humor</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11338009.post-3576743472131944685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this picture was pretty funny. It was sent in by a reader, and is from Break.com.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this picture was pretty funny. It was sent in by a reader, and is from Break.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://swvanews.com/2007/01/08/stuff-roles-downhill/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
